Opus EHR EHR Review (2026)
Integrated CRM + EHR + RCM platform purpose-built for addiction treatment and behavioral health with AI-powered documentation.
Vendor Assessment Scorecard
Weighted rubric using fit signals (deployment model, scope, pricing posture, certification, market maturity, and review rating), then calibrated to separate tiers more clearly.
Composite Score
7.2/10
Opus EHR Overview
OPUS EHR All-In-One Solution
Overview
Opus EHR is a cloud-based electronic health record platform built specifically for addiction treatment and behavioral health organizations. Founded in 2015, it has established itself as a mid-market alternative to larger incumbents like Kipu and Netsmart, with a particular focus on substance use disorder (SUD) treatment centers that need more than just clinical documentation -- they need a unified system that covers the entire patient lifecycle from first contact through recovery.
The platform's defining characteristic is its integration of three traditionally separate systems into one: a CRM for admissions and referral management, a clinical EHR for documentation and treatment, and a revenue cycle management (RCM) engine for billing. This CRM-to-RCM architecture mirrors the approach taken by newer entrants like Ease, but Opus has been building on this model since 2015, giving it a longer runway of iteration and customer feedback in the SUD treatment vertical.
One feature that genuinely stands out is recovery coaching rounds documentation. Residential SUD programs rely heavily on recovery coaches and behavioral health technicians who conduct rounds -- checking on patients, documenting observations, and flagging concerns. Most EHRs treat this workflow as an afterthought, forcing facilities to use paper logs or improvised workarounds. Opus built dedicated tooling for it. For residential treatment centers, this is the kind of operational detail that separates a platform that understands the business from one that merely supports clinical documentation.
Opus also ships with Copilot AI, which the company claims reduces documentation time by up to 40%. The AI assists with clinical narrative generation and is integrated into the documentation workflow. While many behavioral health EHR vendors are racing to add AI capabilities, Opus's implementation is production-ready and positioned as a core feature rather than a beta add-on.
The platform serves organizations across the size spectrum -- from smaller outpatient programs to multi-facility enterprise operations -- and offers a notable pricing wrinkle: a free complimentary user for basic scheduling and billing. This freemium entry point is unusual in the behavioral health EHR market, where most vendors require a sales conversation before you can touch the software.
Disclosure: EHR Source is an independent review site with no business relationship with Opus EHR or any vendor listed on this site. Our reviews are based on publicly available information, user feedback, and hands-on evaluation.
Key Features
Copilot AI
AI-powered documentation that reduces clinical note writing time by up to 40%.
Integrated CRM
Full admissions pipeline with lead capture, referral tracking, and conversion analytics.
Recovery Coaching Rounds
Dedicated rounds documentation for residential recovery coaches and BHTs.
E-Prescribing (EPCS)
DEA-compliant controlled substance prescribing for MAT programs.
Outcomes Measurement
Visual progress graphs for patient engagement and payer reporting.
Free Entry Tier
Complimentary user for scheduling and billing to evaluate before committing.
Copilot AI Documentation
Opus EHR's Copilot AI is the platform's flagship technology differentiator. The AI assists clinicians by generating clinical narratives from structured data inputs, auto-populating progress notes, and suggesting documentation content based on session context. Opus claims a 40% reduction in documentation time, which, if accurate, represents a substantial productivity gain for clinical staff who typically spend 30-50% of their working hours on documentation.
The Copilot is embedded in the clinical workflow rather than operating as a standalone tool. Clinicians interact with it during the documentation process itself -- as they complete assessments, enter session data, and finalize notes. This inline approach avoids the context-switching overhead that comes with third-party AI documentation tools that operate outside the EHR. The implementation is comparable to what Ease offers with its AI Scribe, though the two platforms take different approaches to the underlying AI architecture.
CRM and Admissions Pipeline
The integrated CRM module covers the full admissions lifecycle: lead capture, referral source tracking, insurance verification, contact management, and conversion analytics. For addiction treatment centers where the admissions pipeline directly drives revenue, having this data in the same system as clinical documentation and billing provides operational visibility that separate systems cannot match without expensive integrations.
The CRM tracks referral sources and their performance over time, giving admissions directors data on which relationships are producing admissions and which need cultivation. Lead-to-admission conversion tracking creates a measurable pipeline that treatment centers can use to optimize their marketing and referral development spend. This is the same architectural philosophy that Ease follows, and it is a meaningful advantage over platforms like AZZLY Rize that offer referral tracking but not a full CRM pipeline.
E-Prescribing with EPCS
Opus includes integrated e-prescribing with EPCS (Electronic Prescribing of Controlled Substances) that is fully DEA compliant. For SUD treatment programs -- particularly those running medication-assisted treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine, naltrexone, or methadone -- this is essential functionality. The e-prescribing module handles controlled and non-controlled medications, includes drug interaction checking, and maintains a medication history that is accessible across the clinical team.
Having EPCS natively in the EHR eliminates the need for standalone prescribing platforms like DrFirst or separate pharmacy integrations. For MAT-focused programs, this reduces both cost and the clinical risk that comes with managing medications across disconnected systems.
Integrated Telehealth
Opus provides built-in HIPAA-compliant telehealth that was specifically designed for SUD and behavioral health use cases. The telehealth module is integrated with scheduling, clinical documentation, and billing -- so a telehealth session follows the same workflow as an in-person encounter without requiring separate documentation or billing processes. This is table-stakes functionality in 2026, but the SUD-specific implementation matters: the platform supports group telehealth sessions, which are critical for IOP and outpatient SUD programs that deliver a significant portion of their services through group therapy.
Recovery Coaching Rounds Documentation
This is Opus EHR's most distinctive clinical feature. Recovery coaching rounds are a core operational workflow in residential treatment facilities -- recovery coaches and behavioral health technicians conduct regular check-ins with patients, document observations, flag clinical concerns, and track behavioral patterns. In most EHRs, this workflow is either unsupported (forcing facilities to use paper) or awkwardly shoehorned into progress note templates that were not designed for it.
Opus built dedicated rounds documentation tooling that allows recovery coaches to quickly log observations, track patient status across shifts, and escalate concerns to clinical staff through the platform. For residential SUD programs that rely on recovery coaches as a primary point of patient contact, this feature eliminates a significant documentation gap and improves the continuity of care between clinical sessions.
Assessment Tools
The platform includes 100+ customizable assessment tools covering the clinical assessments most commonly used in SUD and behavioral health treatment: ASAM criteria, PHQ-9, GAD-7, AUDIT, DAST, Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, and many others. Assessments are built into the clinical workflow so that results feed directly into treatment planning and documentation. The assessment library is customizable, allowing organizations to add facility-specific instruments or modify existing ones to meet payer or accreditation requirements.
Dynamic Dashboards and Analytics
Opus provides dynamic dashboards that give clinical and administrative leaders real-time visibility into key operational metrics: census, admissions pipeline, revenue cycle performance, clinical outcomes, and staff productivity. The dashboards are configurable, allowing organizations to surface the metrics that matter most to their operations. For multi-facility organizations, the analytics provide roll-up views across locations alongside facility-level detail.
Outcomes Measurement
The outcomes measurement module tracks patient progress over time using standardized instruments, with visual graphs that make outcome trends accessible to both clinicians and patients. This is increasingly important as payers, accreditors, and referral sources demand evidence of treatment effectiveness. The visual presentation makes outcomes data useful in clinical sessions (showing patients their progress) and in reporting to external stakeholders.
Lab Integration
Opus supports lab integration for ordering and receiving lab results within the platform. For SUD programs that rely heavily on drug screening and toxicology testing, having lab results flow directly into the clinical record eliminates manual data entry and ensures that screening results are immediately available for clinical decision-making.
Billing and Revenue Cycle Management
The integrated RCM module covers claims generation, submission, tracking, ERA/EOB processing, and denial management. Claims are generated from clinical encounters, reducing the documentation-to-billing gap that causes revenue leakage in many treatment centers. Insurance eligibility verification is built into the admissions workflow, and the platform supports the complex billing scenarios common in SUD treatment -- multiple levels of care, per-diem residential billing, and the varying payer rules that make behavioral health billing notoriously difficult.
Compliance and Security
The platform is ONC certified and HIPAA compliant, with role-based access control and audit trails. For SUD treatment providers, 42 CFR Part 2 compliance for substance use disorder records is supported. The cloud-based architecture provides automatic updates, data backup, and disaster recovery without on-premise infrastructure requirements.
Pros
- + Purpose-built for SUD and addiction treatment. Every workflow in Opus was designed for substance use disorder and behavioral health treatment -- not adapted from a general medical EHR. ASAM-aligned documentation, MAT workflows, recovery coaching rounds, and residential census management are native features, not afterthoughts.
- + Integrated CRM + EHR + RCM in a single platform. The unified architecture eliminates the need for separate admissions, clinical, and billing systems. Data flows from lead capture through treatment and billing without manual handoffs or integration maintenance, reducing both cost and operational friction.
- + Recovery coaching rounds documentation -- a genuinely unique feature. No other major SUD EHR offers dedicated tooling for recovery coaching rounds. For residential programs where recovery coaches are a primary point of patient contact, this eliminates paper-based workarounds and improves care continuity across shifts.
- + Copilot AI reduces documentation burden. The claimed 40% reduction in documentation time, if realized, represents a significant productivity gain. The AI is embedded in the clinical workflow rather than being a standalone bolt-on, which improves adoption and reduces context-switching.
- + Free complimentary user for scheduling and billing. This is a rare freemium entry point in the behavioral health EHR market. Organizations can evaluate the platform's scheduling and billing capabilities without financial commitment, which lowers the barrier to initial adoption and reduces evaluation risk.
- + 100+ customizable assessment tools. The extensive library of clinical assessments covers the instruments most commonly used in SUD and behavioral health treatment, and the customization capability allows organizations to adapt assessments to payer and accreditation requirements without vendor involvement.
- + Strong clinical management capabilities. The combination of e-prescribing with EPCS, lab integration, outcomes measurement with visual graphs, and comprehensive assessment tooling provides a robust clinical management environment that supports evidence-based SUD treatment.
- + ONC certified with DEA-compliant EPCS. Federal certification provides assurance on interoperability standards, and DEA-compliant e-prescribing is non-negotiable for MAT programs. Having both natively in the platform is a foundational requirement that Opus meets.
- + Outcomes measurement with visual tracking. The ability to show patients their progress through visual graphs is clinically valuable for engagement and motivation, while the same data supports payer and accreditation reporting requirements.
Cons
- − Customer support responsiveness issues. Multiple user reports cite 2+ week response delays from the Opus support team. For a clinical system that directly impacts patient care and revenue operations, slow support turnaround is a significant operational risk. This is the most frequently cited complaint in user reviews and should be a key evaluation criterion during the sales process.
- − Learning curve for the full platform. The breadth of Opus's feature set -- CRM, clinical documentation, AI tools, billing, e-prescribing, analytics -- means there is a substantial amount to learn. Organizations should plan for dedicated training time beyond the initial implementation, particularly for staff who will use the CRM and advanced clinical features.
- − May be more platform than small practices need. The all-in-one CRM + EHR + RCM architecture is designed for treatment centers with admissions pipelines, multiple staff roles, and complex billing. Solo practitioners and very small outpatient-only practices will find platforms like TherapyNotes or SimplePractice simpler and more appropriately scoped.
- − Newer to market than Kipu in the SUD space. While Opus was founded in 2015, Kipu has been the dominant SUD EHR for longer and has a larger installed base. Organizations that weight vendor market presence and user community size heavily in their evaluation should factor this in.
- − Quote-based pricing for full access lacks transparency. While the free complimentary user provides a low-risk entry point, understanding the cost of full platform access requires engaging in a sales conversation. This adds friction to the early evaluation process and makes it harder to compare costs against competitors during initial vendor screening.
- − AI documentation claims need independent validation. The 40% documentation time reduction claim has not been independently verified in peer-reviewed studies. While AI-assisted documentation is a genuine productivity gain, organizations should evaluate the Copilot's output quality and actual time savings during their own trial period rather than relying on marketing claims.
- − Not designed for general medical or non-behavioral health settings. Opus is a behavioral health and SUD platform. Organizations with primary care, urgent care, or medical-surgical services alongside their behavioral health programs will need a separate system for those workflows.
Pricing
Opus EHR uses a tiered pricing model that is unusual in the behavioral health EHR market. The entry point is a free complimentary user that includes basic scheduling and billing functionality. This allows organizations to get started with the platform without financial commitment -- a rare offering in a market where most vendors require a demo-to-quote sales cycle before you can access the software.
Full platform access -- including clinical documentation, CRM, Copilot AI, e-prescribing, telehealth, outcomes measurement, and advanced analytics -- requires a custom quote based on organization size, number of users, and feature requirements. Exact pricing is not publicly disclosed, which is standard practice among behavioral health EHR vendors in this segment.
Opus EHR Pricing Tiers
| Tier | Includes | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Free Complimentary User | Basic scheduling, billing | Free |
| Full Platform Access | EHR + CRM + RCM + AI + e-prescribing + telehealth + analytics | Custom quote |
The key pricing consideration is the all-in-one value proposition. Because Opus bundles CRM, clinical EHR, billing/RCM, e-prescribing, telehealth, and AI documentation into a single platform, organizations should compare the total cost against the combined expense of separate systems for each function. A treatment center running a standalone CRM, a separate EHR, and an outsourced billing service is likely spending more in aggregate -- before accounting for the cost and complexity of integrating those systems.
Total Cost of Ownership: All-in-One vs. Point Solutions
| Cost Component | Separate Systems | Opus EHR (All-in-One) |
|---|---|---|
| EHR license | $200-500/provider/mo | Single bundled subscription |
| Billing / RCM service | 4-8% of collections | |
| CRM / admissions tool | $50-200/user/mo | |
| AI documentation tool | $100-300/provider/mo | |
| Telehealth platform | $30-100/provider/mo | |
| Integration costs | $5,000-25,000+ setup | None (native) |
| Vendor management overhead | 3-5 vendor relationships | Single vendor relationship |
The free tier is a smart evaluation strategy: organizations can onboard a scheduling/billing user at zero cost, assess the platform's interface and basic functionality, and then make an informed decision about upgrading to full access. This is a lower-risk entry path than many competitors offer.
For a broader comparison of EHR pricing models across the industry, see our EHR cost guide.
Who Should Use Opus EHR
Opus EHR is designed for organizations whose clinical work centers on addiction treatment and behavioral health, and who need a unified system that covers admissions through billing. Specifically:
- Substance use disorder treatment centers -- residential, PHP, IOP, and outpatient programs that need SUD-specific documentation, recovery coaching rounds, MAT workflows, and specialized billing for addiction treatment.
- Residential treatment facilities with recovery coaching staff -- programs that rely on recovery coaches and behavioral health technicians for patient monitoring will benefit from the dedicated rounds documentation feature that no other major EHR offers.
- Mid-size treatment organizations looking to consolidate their tech stack -- facilities currently running separate systems for admissions CRM, clinical documentation, and billing that want to unify operations under a single platform without the enterprise pricing of Netsmart.
- MAT programs -- clinics prescribing buprenorphine, naltrexone, or other controlled substances that need DEA-compliant EPCS e-prescribing integrated with clinical documentation and billing.
- Organizations that want to try before they buy -- the free complimentary user tier allows organizations to evaluate the platform's scheduling and billing capabilities before committing to a full subscription.
- Treatment centers with active referral pipelines -- organizations where admissions volume is a key business driver and where having CRM and lead conversion data in the same system as clinical operations provides measurable value.
- Programs focused on outcomes measurement -- treatment centers that need to demonstrate clinical effectiveness to payers, accreditors, or referral sources will benefit from the built-in outcomes tracking with visual graphs.
Who Should NOT Use Opus EHR
No EHR is the right fit for every organization. Opus EHR is not the best match for:
- Solo therapists and very small outpatient practices. Individual practitioners with straightforward documentation and billing needs will find platforms like TherapyNotes or SimplePractice simpler, cheaper, and faster to set up. Opus's CRM, recovery coaching, and enterprise features are unnecessary overhead at this scale.
- General medical and hospital practices. Opus is a behavioral health and SUD platform. Primary care, urgent care, surgical, or multi-specialty medical groups need a general ambulatory or hospital EHR. See our vendor directory for broader options.
- Organizations that require rock-solid customer support. If responsive vendor support is your top priority -- and for clinical systems it should be high on the list -- the reported 2+ week support delays are a red flag. Organizations that cannot tolerate slow support turnaround should evaluate AZZLY Rize (known for strong customer support) or verify that Opus has addressed these issues before committing.
- Large enterprise organizations with complex state reporting requirements. While Opus serves enterprise customers, organizations with extensive state reporting, HIE, and interoperability requirements may find that Netsmart offers deeper capabilities in these areas, particularly for community behavioral health organizations with Medicaid reporting mandates.
- Psychiatry-only practices without SUD treatment. Standalone psychiatric practices that focus on medication management and therapy without a SUD component may find Opus's SUD-specific features (recovery coaching, MAT workflows, residential census) to be unnecessary complexity. Valant or TherapyNotes may be a better fit.
Implementation
Opus EHR's cloud-based architecture simplifies deployment compared to on-premise systems, but the breadth of the platform means that implementation requires thoughtful planning across multiple operational domains. Key factors that influence the implementation experience:
- Cloud-based deployment. There is no on-premise hardware to procure or maintain. The platform is accessed through a web browser, which simplifies rollout across multiple locations and eliminates infrastructure overhead.
- CRM configuration matters. Organizations that plan to use the CRM module need to configure referral source categories, pipeline stages, and lead routing rules that match their admissions workflow. This is not plug-and-play -- it requires input from the admissions team to set up correctly.
- Assessment library customization. While Opus includes 100+ assessments out of the box, most organizations will need to customize or add assessments to match their specific payer requirements, accreditation standards, and clinical protocols. Plan for this as a configuration phase, not a post-go-live activity.
- Recovery coaching rounds setup. Residential programs should involve recovery coaching supervisors in the implementation process to configure rounds documentation workflows, shift schedules, and escalation protocols. This is a feature that other platforms do not offer, so there is no legacy workflow to migrate -- but it needs to be designed intentionally.
- Data migration. Moving clinical records, patient demographics, and billing data from a prior system requires planning and validation. Organizations migrating from Kipu, AZZLY Rize, or other SUD EHRs should discuss data migration scope and timelines early in the sales process.
- Training investment. Given the reported learning curve, organizations should plan for dedicated training sessions for each user role -- clinical staff, billing, admissions/CRM, and administrative users. The breadth of the platform means that a single training session will not be sufficient.
The free complimentary user can serve as an informal pilot: organizations can onboard a scheduling/billing user to test the platform's interface and basic workflows before committing to a full implementation. This is a practical risk-mitigation strategy that few competitors offer.
For a comprehensive overview of what to expect during any EHR implementation, see our EHR implementation checklist.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes Opus EHR different from other addiction treatment EHRs?
Opus EHR differentiates by integrating CRM, EHR, and RCM into a single platform built specifically for substance use disorder and behavioral health treatment. It includes Copilot AI for documentation automation, recovery coaching rounds documentation (a feature unique among SUD EHRs), 100+ customizable assessment tools, and a free complimentary user tier for scheduling and billing. The combination of CRM-to-discharge coverage and SUD-specific clinical workflows sets it apart from general behavioral health platforms.
Does Opus EHR have AI features?
Yes. Opus EHR includes Copilot AI, which the company claims reduces clinical documentation time by up to 40%. The AI assists with generating clinical narratives, progress notes, and treatment documentation. It is integrated directly into the clinical workflow rather than requiring a separate third-party tool. While the 40% reduction claim has not been independently verified, AI-assisted documentation is a genuine productivity gain for clinical staff.
Is Opus EHR suitable for addiction treatment centers?
Yes. Opus EHR was purpose-built for addiction treatment and substance use disorder programs. It supports residential, PHP, IOP, and outpatient levels of care with SUD-specific documentation, recovery coaching rounds, MAT workflows with EPCS e-prescribing, outcomes measurement with visual tracking, and specialized billing for behavioral health services. See our best EHR for addiction treatment guide for a broader comparison.
How much does Opus EHR cost?
Opus EHR offers a free complimentary user that includes basic scheduling and billing functionality. Full platform access -- including clinical documentation, CRM, e-prescribing, telehealth, and AI features -- requires a custom quote based on organization size and needs. This freemium-to-quote model gives organizations a low-risk way to evaluate the platform before committing. For a broader pricing comparison, see our EHR cost guide.
Does Opus EHR support e-prescribing for controlled substances?
Yes. Opus EHR includes integrated e-prescribing with EPCS (Electronic Prescribing of Controlled Substances) that is fully DEA compliant. This is essential for MAT programs prescribing buprenorphine (Suboxone), naltrexone (Vivitrol), and other controlled substances commonly used in addiction treatment. Drug interaction checking is built into the prescribing workflow.
How does Opus EHR compare to Kipu and AZZLY Rize?
Opus EHR competes directly with Kipu and AZZLY Rize in the SUD treatment EHR space. Compared to Kipu, Opus offers integrated CRM and a free entry-level tier but has a smaller installed base. Compared to AZZLY Rize, Opus provides broader CRM functionality, AI documentation tools, and recovery coaching rounds, but AZZLY Rize is known for stronger customer support responsiveness. All three platforms are purpose-built for addiction treatment. See our behavioral health EHR comparison for a detailed breakdown.
Verdict
Opus EHR occupies a well-defined position in the SUD treatment EHR market: it is a purpose-built addiction treatment platform that goes deeper into the operational workflow than most competitors by integrating CRM, clinical EHR, and RCM into a single system with genuinely unique features like recovery coaching rounds documentation. For residential SUD treatment centers that need more than clinical documentation -- that need a system spanning from first-contact admissions through recovery coaching through final billing -- Opus delivers a compelling unified experience.
The Copilot AI and recovery coaching rounds are the two features that most clearly differentiate Opus from the competitive field. The AI documentation capabilities put it in the same conversation as Ease (which also ships with native AI), while the recovery coaching tooling addresses a workflow that no other major SUD EHR has productized. For residential programs that employ recovery coaches, this alone may justify a serious evaluation.
The free complimentary user is a smart go-to-market strategy that gives prospective customers a genuine try-before-you-buy path. In a market where vendor demos and sales conversations are the only way to evaluate most platforms, the ability to actually use the software -- even in a limited capacity -- is a meaningful differentiator.
The trade-off is support responsiveness. The reported 2+ week support delays are a serious concern for any clinical system. EHR issues can directly impact patient care, billing revenue, and regulatory compliance -- waiting two weeks for a support response is not acceptable in a clinical environment. Organizations evaluating Opus should make support SLAs a contractual negotiation point and verify that the company has addressed this issue before committing.
The learning curve is the other consideration. Opus is a feature-rich platform, and that richness comes with complexity. Organizations should budget for adequate training and expect a ramp-up period. That said, the complexity exists because the platform does a lot -- and for organizations that are currently stitching together three or four separate systems, the consolidation benefit outweighs the learning investment.
EHR Source Recommendation
Opus EHR is a strong choice for SUD and addiction treatment centers that need a unified CRM + EHR + RCM platform with SUD-specific clinical tools. We recommend it particularly for residential programs that employ recovery coaches, mid-size organizations looking to consolidate multiple systems, and facilities that value AI-powered documentation. Before committing, negotiate support SLAs and use the free complimentary user to evaluate the platform firsthand. For organizations where support responsiveness is the top priority, AZZLY Rize is worth evaluating. For the most modern interface and AI-native experience, also consider Ease. For solo practitioners, SimplePractice or TherapyNotes are more appropriate.
Evaluating multiple options? See our behavioral health EHR comparison for a side-by-side look at the leading platforms, or read our EHR selection guide for a structured evaluation framework.