Implementation 12 min read

MIPS and Promoting Interoperability Workflow Blueprint for EHR Teams

Most performance loss in MIPS and PI is workflow debt, not missing features. This blueprint helps clinical, billing, and informatics teams align EHR workflows to reporting requirements and reduce end-of-year scramble.

Operating Model: Quarterly, Not Annual

High-performing organizations run a quarterly reporting cadence with monthly variance review. Waiting until Q4 to validate measure capture leads to avoidable penalties.

Workflow Blueprint by Function

Front Office

  • Validate demographics, portal activation status, and communication preferences at every registration point.
  • Standardize payer and attribution fields to prevent denominator leakage.

Clinical Team

  • Use structured templates for quality measure capture (not free-text defaults).
  • Assign measure owners per specialty for denominator and numerator review.

Billing and Quality Analytics

  • Reconcile coding outputs against measure logic monthly.
  • Maintain an exceptions queue for missing or contradictory data elements.

Governance and Controls

  • Monthly PI dashboard covering e-prescribing, HIE exchange, and patient access usage.
  • Quarterly mock submission review with compliance and revenue-cycle leadership.
  • Defined defect-management SLA when measure logic changes after EHR updates.

90-Day Launch Plan

  1. Month 1: baseline current measure performance and map workflow handoffs.
  2. Month 2: deploy template, queue, and dashboard updates in pilot clinics.
  3. Month 3: scale and hold first executive performance review.

Use this with our implementation checklist and selection framework if you are re-platforming before the next performance year.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should MIPS and PI performance be reviewed?

High-performing organizations review monthly with quarterly governance checkpoints to correct workflow and data quality gaps early.

What causes most PI performance gaps?

Most gaps are operational, including inconsistent template use, weak ownership, and missing front-office data quality controls.

Do we need separate owners for measure performance?

Yes. Assign role-based owners by specialty and workflow stage to reduce denominator leakage and prevent end-of-year remediation overload.

Editorial Standards

Last reviewed:

Methodology

  • Mapped CMS MIPS/PI program requirements into role-based EHR workflow controls.
  • Prioritized actions that reduce denominator leakage and late-cycle correction effort.
  • Designed cadence around operational reporting rather than one-time annual cleanup.

Primary Sources